| Selecting
a Mediator
Before establishing criteria to select a mediator,
it is necessary to define what is meant by mediator.
The mediator contemplated by this article is a facilitator rather
than a decision
maker or evaluator. The mediator as facilitator allows the disputants
to determine their own resolution. Self determination is the
benchmark
of the mediator as facilitator. This mediator is not a fact finder
or fault finder. This mediator relies on the disputant to value
their claims because they have a better sense of these values
than the mediator ever will.
Process expertise, more than substantive expertise, is an essential
club in this mediators bag.
With this said, a mediator should:
be, and be perceived to be, neutral and fair,
ensure equality in the process,
be known to be trustworthy, and a guardian of confidences,
be respectful and civil to the disputants,
be creative, flexible, patient and hardworking,
stimulate the flow of ideas and possible resolutions,
seek and understand the facts of the controversy,
understand the applicable law or rules,
be experienced in conflict resolution,
understand the motivations of disputants,
be a seasoned problem solver,
be persuasive, if necessary, and
listen carefully.
|